•  
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership
  • Awards
  • Events
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Links
  • Contact
  • LoginLogin
  • LogoutRegister
  • Print FriendlyPrint Friendly
  • Publications Home
  • 2007 Proceedings
  • 2006 Workshop (PDF)
  • 2005 Proceedings (PDF)
  • 2004 Proceedings (PDF)
  • 2003 Proceedings
  • 2002 Proceedings
  • 2002 World Congress
  • 2001 Proceedings
  • 1999 Proceedings
  • 1998 Proceedings
  • 1997 Proceedings
  • 1994 Proceedings
  • 1993 Proceedings
  • 1992 Proceedings
  • 1991 Proceedings
  • 1990 Proceedings

ASA 2008


  • 2008 Student Awards
  • 2007 Conference Abstracts
  • ASFB Committees
  • National & International Events

ASFB Home > 2007 > Utility of habitat as a surrogate measure of reef fish diversity in the zoning of the Lord Howe Island Marine Park

Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Utility of habitat as a surrogate measure of reef fish diversity in the zoning of the Lord Howe Island Marine Park

Malcolm Lindsay1, Heather M. Patterson2 and Stephen E. Swearer1

1 Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, www.unimelb.edu.au, Email m.lindsay@zoology.unimelb.edu.au, sswearer@unimelb.edu.au
2
Australian Fisheries Management Authority, PO Box 7051 Canberra BC, Canberra ACT 2610, www.afma.gov.au, Email heather.patterson@afma.gov.au

Abstract

Marine reserves are being widely implemented as a tool for fisheries management and biodiversity conservation. Although the siting of marine reserves often includes a surrogate measure of diversity, the precision of these measures is rarely tested. To create the marine park at Lord Howe Island, habitat was used as a surrogate for community diversity. The aims of this study were to test the precision of habitat in predicting reef fish assemblage structure, and to investigate changes in precision when varying resolutions of baseline habitat data were available. Visual counts of reef fish species and habitat surveys were conducted at 31 sites. Overall, the variations in fish assemblage among sites were moderately correlated with habitat variations, while fish assemblages were weakly spatially auto-correlated, strongly affecting sites within a proximity of 1 km. The ability of habitat classes to predict reef fish assemblage structure was dependent on the quality and quantity of baseline data. Differences in assemblage structure were found among habitat classes derived from detailed high-resolution data, but not among habitat classes defined from low-resolution data. This study highlights the need for accurate in situ ecological information to establish precise habitat surrogates to more effectively site marine reserves.

Key words

marine parks, conservation, reef fish, habitat surrogates, assemblage structure

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page

Australian Society for Fish Biology
  • © 2008 Australian Society for Fish Biology
  • Copyright and Disclaimer
Powered by RegionalNet!