•  
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership
  • Awards
  • Events
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Links
  • Contact
  • LoginLogin
  • LogoutRegister
  • Print FriendlyPrint Friendly
  • Publications Home
  • 2007 Proceedings
  • 2006 Workshop (PDF)
  • 2005 Proceedings (PDF)
  • 2004 Proceedings (PDF)
  • 2003 Proceedings
  • 2002 Proceedings
  • 2002 World Congress
  • 2001 Proceedings
  • 1999 Proceedings
  • 1998 Proceedings
  • 1997 Proceedings
  • 1994 Proceedings
  • 1993 Proceedings
  • 1992 Proceedings
  • 1991 Proceedings
  • 1990 Proceedings

ASA 2008


  • 2008 Student Awards
  • 2007 Conference Abstracts
  • ASFB Committees
  • National & International Events

ASFB Home > 2007 > Fish body condition of two ecological generalists in the Moonie River, upper Murray-Darling Basin Australia

Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Fish body condition of two ecological generalists in the Moonie River, upper Murray-Darling Basin Australia

Stephen Balcombe 1, Diana Ly1, Jon Marshall2 and Jaye Lobegeiger2

1 Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia.
2
Department of Natural Resources and Water and eWater Cooperative Research Centre, 120 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland, 4068, Australia.

Abstract

Fish living in the Moonie River, must cope with a range of environmental stresses associated with the unpredictable and highly variable hydrological regime of this dryland river. To investigate spatial and temporal variability in fish condition in the Moonie River we examined tissue lipid and water content of two ecological generalists: bony bream (Nematalosa erebi) and yellow belly (Macquaria ambigua) on three occasions (February, May, September 2006) in disconnected waterholes following summer flooding in January 2006. We predicted that fish condition would be highest in February due to the feeding benefits provided by flooding and condition would diminish thereafter as waterholes dried and food resources became limiting. We also predicted fish condition would vary among waterholes due to site-specific differences in waterhole physical character. Preliminary analysis revealed that fish body condition results were dependent on fish size. Larger bodied yellowbelly and bony bream individuals (>80 mm S.L.) had the best (fattest) body condition in February and their condition worsened thereafter. The condition of small (<80 mm S.L) yellowbelly showed little variation over time, while small bony bream were fattest in May 2006. In general, fish condition was not related to waterhole physical character, however bony bream were fatter in waterholes with a weir structure compared to waterholes with no weir structure, while the opposite trend was apparent for yellowbelly.

Keywords

fish condition, hydrological variability, bony bream, yellowbelly, Moonie River

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page

Australian Society for Fish Biology
  • © 2008 Australian Society for Fish Biology
  • Copyright and Disclaimer
Powered by RegionalNet!