•  
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership
  • Awards
  • Events
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Links
  • Contact
  • LoginLogin
  • LogoutRegister
  • Print FriendlyPrint Friendly
  • Publications Home
  • 2007 Proceedings
  • 2006 Workshop (PDF)
  • 2005 Proceedings (PDF)
  • 2004 Proceedings (PDF)
  • 2003 Proceedings
  • 2002 Proceedings
  • 2002 World Congress
  • 2001 Proceedings
  • 1999 Proceedings
  • 1998 Proceedings
  • 1997 Proceedings
  • 1994 Proceedings
  • 1993 Proceedings
  • 1992 Proceedings
  • 1991 Proceedings
  • 1990 Proceedings

ASA 2008


  • 2008 Student Awards
  • 2007 Conference Abstracts
  • ASFB Committees
  • National & International Events

ASFB Home > 2007 > Do larvae disperse? A case study with amphidromous galaxiids and bullies.

Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Do larvae disperse? A case study with amphidromous galaxiids and bullies.

Andrew Hicks1, Gerry Closs1, Jon Waters1, Jonathan Kim2, Bruno David3.

1 Department of Zoology, The University of Otago, New Zealand. Email ashicks@gmail.com.
2
Department of Chemistry, The University of Otago, New Zealand.
3
Department of Conservation, New Zealand.

Abstract

Migratory galaxiids and bully species are characterised by dramatic ontogenetic niche separation between a pelagic larval and benthic adult phase. Adult growth and reproduction occurs in freshwater, whereas larvae are expected to develop at sea. Traditionally, a marine pelagic larval period was thought beneficial because it resulted in offspring dispersal. An alternative view argues a pelagic larval period evolved because small larvae need a pelagic environment for rearing, not because dispersing larvae were adaptive. If so, streams upstream of lakes will be dominated by recruits derived from that lake, irrespective of any connections to the sea. We determined the proportion of fish exhibiting diadromous or non-diadromous recruitment in 6 paired catchments with and without coastal lakes. High retention rates were common within lakes. Most strikingly, 20 out of 20 Galaxias brevipinnis collected upstream of Lake Moeraki, the outlet of which is only 3km from the coast, were self-recruiting. Given the predominance of self-recruitment upstream of coastal lake systems, we suggest retention in estuaries and harbours may also be common. Management of whitebait metapopulations, and other species with pelagic larvae, needs to incorporate an understanding of larval ecology and appreciate the potential for localised recruitment dynamics in systems that promote retention.

Key Words

Larval retention, amphidromy, Galaxias, Gobiomorphus.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page

Australian Society for Fish Biology
  • © 2008 Australian Society for Fish Biology
  • Copyright and Disclaimer
Powered by RegionalNet!