•  
  • Home
  • About
  • Membership
  • Awards
  • Events
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Links
  • Contact
  • LoginLogin
  • LogoutRegister
  • Print FriendlyPrint Friendly
  • Publications Home
  • 2007 Proceedings
  • 2006 Workshop (PDF)
  • 2005 Proceedings (PDF)
  • 2004 Proceedings (PDF)
  • 2003 Proceedings
  • 2002 Proceedings
  • 2002 World Congress
  • 2001 Proceedings
  • 1999 Proceedings
  • 1998 Proceedings
  • 1997 Proceedings
  • 1994 Proceedings
  • 1993 Proceedings
  • 1992 Proceedings
  • 1991 Proceedings
  • 1990 Proceedings

ASA 2008


  • 2008 Student Awards
  • 2007 Conference Abstracts
  • ASFB Committees
  • National & International Events

ASFB Home > 2007 > Temporal and spatial sampling efficiency of the Queensland DPI&F freshwater Long Term Monitoring Program (1999-2006)

Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Temporal and spatial sampling efficiency of the Queensland DPI&F freshwater Long Term Monitoring Program (1999-2006)

Wayne Robinson1, Emil Rigby1 and Eddie Jebreeen2

1University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC 4558, QLD, www.usc.edu.au, Email wayne.robinson@usc.edu.au
2
Queensland DPI&F Southern Fisheries Centre, PO Box 76, Deception Bay ,4508, Email Edward.Jebreen@dpi.qld.gov.au

Abstract

We reviewed the efficiency of the current sampling protocol data for the QLD DPI&F Long Term Monitoring Program with regards to the number of fish species collected. The majority of sites are not exhaustively sampled in any given year but cumulatively almost all of the sites have had 90% or more of their species recorded. The Daintree, Johnstone, Mitchell and Noosa rivers however may have up to 20 species still to be collected. There was very low probability of returning complete species inventories for any of the rivers on any year using the current protocol of seven sites per river. Individual sites within the Condamine were efficiently sampled on any given date and the Warrego river the least likely to have new species in future sampling. If the number of sites were to remain fixed then 9 shots per site would return a more complete species list for most rivers. It would be possible however to adjust the effort at sites independently to avoid over-sampling some sites and under-sampling others. The results are probably influenced by the coastal rivers being under-sampled if they include estuarine sites. Overall, the data have been under-utilised and are a valuable resource that could be put through a suitable bio-monitoring framework for these rivers.

Key Words

Electrofishing, Species accumulation, Biomonitoring.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page

Australian Society for Fish Biology
  • © 2008 Australian Society for Fish Biology
  • Copyright and Disclaimer
Powered by RegionalNet!